Tulsi Gabbard: Trump response to Saudi oil strikes a ‘disgrace’

Tulsi Gabbard: Trump response to Saudi oil strikes a ‘disgrace’


>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. THE PRESIDENT HAS ALREADY ORDERED INCREASED SANCTIONS FOLLOWING THAT ATTACK THAT THE IRANIANS WERE NOW BEHIND OR OUR INTELLIGENCE SAYS THAT ON SAUDI ARABIA. DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT CHAPEL CANDIDATE TULSI GABBARD WONDERS IF THE PRESIDENT IS DOING OUR COUNTRY’S BIDDING OR SAUDI ARABIA’S. IT’S HARD TO SAY. CONGRESSMAN, VERY GOOD TO HAVE YOU.>>THANKS, NEIL. GOOD TO SEE YOU.>>Neil: WHAT SURPRISED FOLKS IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH YOU HAMMERED THAT CHARGE OF THE PRESIDENT THAT SAID YOU’RE NOT OUR PIMP. WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT?>>WELL, LET’S JUST MAKE SURE THAT WE’RE ON THE SAME PAGE HERE AND RECOGNIZE THE CONTEXT. WHAT I WAS RESPONDING TO THAT THE PRESIDENT TWEETED OUT AND I WANT TO READ YOU WHAT HE SAID IN THAT TWEET SAYING THAT “WE’RE WAITING TO HEAR FROM THE KINGDOM AS TO WHO THEY BELIEVE WAS THE CAUSE OF THIS ATTACK AND UNDER WHAT TERMS WE WOULD PROCEED.” LOOK, NEIL, I’M A SOLDIER. I TOOK AN OATH AS A SOLDIER AND A MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION, TO SERVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AND IT’S A HUGE DISGRACE TO HEAR OUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF BASICALLY PUT US IN A POSITION, PUT US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM, OUR MILITARY ASSETS IN A POSITION WHERE WE’RE SERVANTS OF THE SAUDI KINGDOM. STANDING BY AND AWAITING THEIR ORDERS ON HOW WE SHOULD PROCEED.>>Neil: WAS HE SAYING THAT, CONGRESS WOMAN, AS MUCH AS THAT THEY’RE LOOKING INTO THIS. THEY’RE NOT MARCHING ORDERS HERE. THEY’RE TRYING TO ASCERTAIN WHO WAS BEHIND THAT ATTACK AND THAT IS WHAT I THINK HE WAS WAITING ON.>>WELL, IF TRUMP DIDN’T MEAN WHAT HE SAID WHEN HE TWEETED THAT OUT, THAT WE’VE GOT TO SEE UNDER WHAT TERMS WE WOULD PROCEED, THEN HE NEEDS TO CLARIFY WHAT HE SAID AND ACTUALLY SAY WHAT HE MEANT. HE’S THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. HE’S THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE STRONGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD. HE NEEDS TO BE CLEAR. THIS WAS SAID A COUPLE DAYS AGO, HE’S NOT ISSUED ANY KIND OF CLARIFICATION. ALL WE CAN PRESUME IS HE SAID WHAT HE MEANT IN THAT TWEET.>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. HE’S NOT RESPONDED TO YOUR ALLEGATIONS OR EVEN TWEETED A RESPONSE. BUT WHAT YOU DID SAID, I NEVER ENGAGE IN HATEFUL RHETORIC AGAINST YOU OR YOUR FAMILY, NEVER WILL BUT YOU’RE OFFERING OUR MILITARY ASSETS TO THE DICTATOR OF SAUDI ARABIA. THE QUESTION I HAD FOR YOU, CONGRESSWOMAN, IF YOU BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND SAUDI ARABIA WERE ATTACKED LIKE IT WAS HERE AND APPARENTLY BY IRAN, WOULD YOU NOT INTERVENE?>>I WOULD DO WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR COUNTRY. AS A SOLDIER I SEE THESE THINGS VERY CLEARLY, SEEING WHAT IS OUR GOAL, WHAT IS OUR OBJECTIVE. WITH IRAN, WE HAVE TWO PRIMARY OBJECTIVES. NUMBER 1, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY’RE NO LONGER MOVING FORWARD OF BUILDING THEIR NUCLEAR CAPABILITY AS THEY CURRENTLY ARE. NUMBER 2, TO PREVENT THIS ALL-OUT SHOOTING WAR WITH IRAN THAT IT APPEARS WE’RE HEADING TOWARDS, THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR TWO REASONS. NUMBER 1, WE HAVE TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. KEEP THAT AT THE FOREFRONT. WE CAN ACCOMPLISH THESE OBJECTIVES BY UNDERSTANDING AND REALIZING THAT THE CURRENT STRATEGY HAS FAILED. IT’S NOT HELPING US ACHIEVE THAT OBJECTIVE AND WE NEED TO REENTER THE IRAN NUCLEAR AGREEMENT AND GET RID OF THESE CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS THAT ARE CONTINUING TO ESCALATE THIS WAR AGAINST IRAN.>>Neil: WELL, IRAN HAS BEEN DOING THIS STUFF WITH OR WITHOUT SANCTIONS, WITH OR WITHOUT A DEAL. DOESN’T –>>THAT’S NOT TRUE.>>Neil: THEIR PROVOCATIVE BEHAVIOR –>>THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL WAS IN PLACE, IRAN WAS FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE BY OUR OWN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND OTHER COUNTRIES AGENCIES. THEY WERE COMPLYING WITH THE DEAL. THEY WERE NOT MOVING FORWARD TOWARD BUILDING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. NOW IT’S IN THE TRASH, IRAN IS CONTINUING –>>Neil: THE NUCLEAR DEAL NOT WITHSTANDING, THEY’VE ALWAYS BEEN PROVOCATIVE. WHAT I WOULD ASK YOU, WOULD YOU AS PRESIDENT THEN IGNORE THAT PROVOCATION, DEAL OR NO DEAL, WOULD YOU WORK WITH THE SAUDIS? DO YOU LIKE THE SAUDIS MORE OR LESS THAN IRAN? WHAT?>>IT’S NOT ABOUT WHO YOU LIKE OR WHO YOU DON’T LIKE. IT’S ABOUT ONCE AGAIN FOCUSING ON OUR OBJECTIVE OF KEEPING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. WHAT HAS JUST HAPPENED AND TRANSPIRED THE LAST FEW DAYS DIDN’T JUST POP UP OUT OF NOWHERE. WE CAN’T LOOK AT THIS IN ISOLATION. IT WAS KICKED OFF BY PRESIDENT TRUMP WALKING AWAY FROM AND THROWING THAT NUCLEAR DEAL IN THE TRASH, INCREASING — CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS THAT ARE HURTING THE PEOPLE OF IRAN MOST OF ALL, DESIGNATING THEIR MILITARY AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION, DEPLOYING MORE TROOPS TO THE REGION. A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT HAVE PUSHED US, THE WORLD, TO THIS POINT WHERE WE ARE TODAY.>>Neil: SO LET ME ASK YOU. DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE LEADER OF SAUDI ARABIA? A LOT OF SIGNALS POINT THAT HE WAS BEHIND THE KILLING OF “THE WASHINGTON POST” JOURNALIST A YEAR AGO. BUT HE’S STILL IN CHARGE. OTHERS HAVE SAID YOU CAN’T PICK AND CHOOSE YOUR LEADERS OF COUNTRIES YOU DON’T LIKE. IT IS WHAT IT IS. WOULD YOU TALK WITH HIM, DEAL WITH HIM ON AN ATTACK LIKE THIS, DO SOMETHING IN CONCERT WITH HIM?>>I THINK IT’S IMPORTANT UNDER THESE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE READY AND TO HAVE THE WILLINGNESS TO TALK TO LEADERS OF OTHER COUNTRIES. YES, I WOULD MEET WITH THE LEADER OF SAUDI ARABIA AS I WOULD WITH THE LEADER OF IRAN TO DEESCALATE THESE TENSIONS AND SAYING WHAT IS THE BEST INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES AND HOW CAN WE BEST ACCOMPLISH THAT OBJECTIVE, WHICH IS KEEPING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. DOING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. BY PURSUING THESE DIPLOMATIC MEASURES, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREVENT THAT WORST CASE SCENARIO, WHICH IS AN ALL-OUT SHOOTING CONFLICT WAR THAT WOULD CAUSE A DEVASTATING COST TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, TO OUR TROOPS, COUNTLESS LIVES, TRILLIONS MORE DOLLARS. TO SPEAK OF THE IMPACT ON THE DEVASTATION THAT WOULD BE CAUSED AROUND THE REGION AND THE WORLD.>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. SO THE INTERPRETATION IS THAT YOU WANT TO BRING BACK THE IRAN DEAL. BUT IT GIVES A SIGNAL HERE THAT YOU’RE NO FAN OF THE SAUDI LEADERSHIP. I GET THAT. BUT MORE OF A FAN OF THE LEADERSHIP IN IRAN.>>NO, I’M A FAN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I’M A FAN OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AS PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, I WOULD PUT THEIR INTERESTS –>>Neil: IS IT IN OUR INTEREST FOR SAUDI ARABIA TO BE PROTECTED OR ITS KINGDOM TO BE PROTECTED OR DO YOU DRAW A DISTINCTION?>>LET ME TELL YOU WHAT IS NOT IN OUR INTERESTS. THIS ALLIANCE THAT HAS BEEN LONGSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND SAUDI ARABIA IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DIRECTLY AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING AL-QAEDA. WE JUST OBSERVED THE 18th ANNIVERSARY OF THAT TERRIBLE ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY IN 2001. THEY’RE CONTINUING TO SPEND BILLIONS EVERY YEAR PROPAGATING THIS EXTREMIST IDEOLOGY THAT IS FUELLING THE GROWTH OF TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE AL-QUAIDA AND ISES AND OTHERS AROUND THE WORLD. THEY’RE DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THOSE THAT POSE A THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY AND TO THE UNITED STATES. THAT THREAT THAT WE NEED TO DEFEAT.>>Neil: IS THAT THREAT GREATER THAN IRAN?>>YES; IT IS.>>Neil: SAUDI ARABIA IS MORE OF A PROBLEM FOR US –>>IRAN DOES NOT POSE A DIRECT THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES. WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PREVENT IRAN FROM CONTINUING TO MOVE FORWARD TOWARDS DEVELOPING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. THAT IS WHERE WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED. IF I WERE PRESIDENT, THAT’S WHAT I’D BE DOING, GETTING BACK INTO THAT NUCLEAR DEAL, GETTING RID OF THESE CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND BEING ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD IN THE INTERESTS OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.>>Neil: SO A PRESIDENT GABBARD WOULD SEE SAUDI ARABIA AS A BIGGER THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY THAN IRAN.>>WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS SAUDI ARABIA ENDING THEIR SUPPORT FOR AL-QUAIDA. TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE AL-QUAIDA.>>Neil: I’M SORRY. THAT’S NOT WHAT I ASKED.>>I KNOW. YOU’RE TURNING MY WORDS AROUND.>>Neil: NO, NO, NO. I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR. YOU HAVE HIGHER OPINION OF IRAN THAN YOU DO SAUDI ARABIA.>>NO, THAT’S NOT WHAT I’M SAYING.>>Neil: EXPLAIN.>>I’M FOCUSED ON HOW WE CAN BEST KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. ON HOW WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE — WE HAVE OUR NATIONAL SECURITY INTACT.>>Neil: THE SAUDIS ARE A BIGGER LET TO THAT SAFETY THAN IRAN? I WANT TO BE CLEAR.>>THE SAUDIS ARE DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE VERY TERRORIST GROUP THAT ATTACKED US ON 9-11 AND CONTINUE TO POSE A THREAT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TODAY.>>Neil: SO IF THE PRESIDENT WERE TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST IRAN WITH OR WITHOUT SAUDI INTELLIGENCE OR HELP, THAT WOULD BE A BAD MOVE IN YOUR EYES?>>THAT WOULD BE A VERY BAD MOVE. IT WOULD NOT SERVE THE INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES. IT WOULD COST THOUSANDS MORE OF MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN UNIFORM THEIR LIVES. IT WOULD COST US AS TAXPAYERS TRILLIONS — WOULD MAKE THE IRAQ WAR THAT I SERVED IN LOOK LIKE A PICNIC COMPARED TO THE COST AND THE CONSEQUENCE AND THE DEVASTATION THAT WOULD COME ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THAT WAR. TO SPEAK OF THE FACT THAT IT WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL GIVEN THE PRESIDENT WOULD DO THAT WITHOUT THAT AUTHORITY COMING

100 Replies to “Tulsi Gabbard: Trump response to Saudi oil strikes a ‘disgrace’

  1. WHY does the USA seem like they always want to act as the World Police? If two nations want to go to war, WHY does the USA feel a need to be a part of it? The USA, China, Russia, UK, France, Germany, etc. should stay out of the middle east and let them figure it all out for themselves.

  2. thank you Tulsi for a voice of reason and intelligence! The fox news idiot is a delusional fool of a tool! We need you as Secretary of State at least, with your knowledge and understanding!

  3. She jumping the gun. She needs to respect the Commander in Chief. I doubt Tulsi will become President when did she become and expert on deals. She changes her tune when running for President. Scare tactics. Keeping America safe is scared tactics.

  4. I'm thinking everyone is missing the BIG picture here, or everyone is cool with it. She says Saudis have been funding our "favorite" terror groups then and now. 18 years on, 18 more years to come? And only a couple people pick it up. Is everybody now cool with it???? Do we want this stuff over or don't we??? Recognize! No other politician, yours or mine, are hitting us with this truth bomb. Forget the Pres. race, pick up this ball and run with it. Its all here on YT, at indie media channels. Facts, not fiction. Research it from where you sit. Clearly Cavuto is cool with it, can't stop for a minute. The other corporate "news" sites are no better.

  5. Check, IS. is in Yemen now, where? Saudi controlled territory. Check, Yemenis had IS. in a prison, Saudis bombed the prison, let 'em out. Check, NATO used T.grps in Libya as ground troops, bombed Gaddafi's escape route, got him skewered in the a**, "We came, we saw, he died!"

  6. Tulsi, am on your side, may God protect you always.
    He is putting words wrongly against Tulsi. Finally there’s a real woman that got B** to face all this bunch two face hypocrites.
    TULSI WE LOVE YOU!!!

  7. South Arabia is not our friend! It's a dictatorship, that forward extreme ideologies, and do not shear our values. This is why I believe the war against global warming is a war against terrorism; when we stop our dependency on petroleum and spear the movement on green energy then we will be the one calling the shots.

  8. You would meet with these dictators and you would do the same as Obama. Give them what they want, and next thing you know they got nuclear weapons. How is that making American citizens safe tulsi

  9. This woman is a walking contradiction. She "would do what ever is in the best interest of our country"? If she's going to attack Trump for what she perceives as vagueness, she should express a bit more clarity of her own ideas. Maybe she has an identifiable detailed plan as to how she would proceed. Trump also may have a detailed plan but he's the president and she's not! Sure, Trump should lay out every card face up so every evil dictator in the world should be able to plan a counter strategy. Give me a break! Tulsi is just more of the same political scrambling attempting to undermine the president. At first I thought she was fairly genuine. Now I just consider her another one of "THEM".

  10. Tulsi speaks the truth on American foreign policy. She represents those who must do the actual fighting. Unfortunately we will never get a chance to vote for her because the deep state and the military industrial complex will make sure she doesn't go far in the primaries.

  11. Gabbard will say anything scripted to her, to disparage President Trump just as every other Socialist in her party. Nothing new, nothing notable, a big nothing burger.

  12. Tulsi handles herself well, speaks like a normal, rational, compassionate American and avoiding the polarizing, inflated rhetoric of a slick word merchant like Obama. The Fox News interviewer, however, tried to ambush her with word traps along the fashion of what I have come to expect from CNN or MSNBC. He failed.

  13. The virtue signallers must want all Saudi oil production bombed.
    Fossil fuels are out, we'll make solar panels and windmills with no thermal coal for steel, no mining of neodymium etc, no oil to transport the billions of solar panels.

  14. If you don't want to spend $10,000,000 on a loaf of bread then we have to keep OPEC oil secured. I think pegging the dollar to their oil is considered the mother load of ally agreements!

  15. There is no need for the US to act as a guardian for Saudi Arabia. They have purchased billion of dollars worth of armament from the US, the UK, France, Germany and Sweden. They can take care of themselves. As Tulsi pointed out they have been medalling around the world and causing unrest for a long time. 15 of the 19 September 11th attackers at the trade centre were Saudi citizens. Iran, perhaps, would make a good ally to the US someday.

  16. TULSI…TRUMP WILL NEVER TWEET YOU BECAUSE , WHILE I AM A TRUMP SUPPORTER, I WOULD ACTUALLY CONSIDER VOTING FOR YOU. TRUMP KNOWS THAT

  17. She’s good at speaking but @2:36, what is our best interest for our soldiers? She says what is our goal & what is our objective, isn’t that what trump is doing?!? Once those questions are answered, then he can make a decision

  18. Her analysis is amateur. She took President Trump's comments out of context trying to gain political capital. She has a narrow viewpoint, without considering the global picture and America's overall long term best interest in mind. Just because she's a soldier doesn't mean she has the depth of the statesmanship that President Trump has.

  19. Yeah, stop motivating Iran and other nations to arm themselves to the teeth and then discover the trick of nuclear non-proliferation. Sanders/Gabbard 2020 and discover real peace, man

  20. I think the real Tulsi Gabbard is starting to show through. Before its over she'll look a lot different from when people first liked her. She is not a friend of anyone but herself. The most irritating thing is she talks like she was a general in war. Her opinion doesn't trump any other soldier who served. But she uses the same lines over and over and they're already wearing thin.

  21. 45 Presidents failed to slap Iran and teach them a lesson, so what would the 46th do any different?
    Tulsi is good but not a presidential material…

  22. "Experience demands that man is the only animal which devours his own kind, for I can apply no milder term to the general prey of the rich on the poor."

  23. divestment from the war machine is a bi-partisan issue.. that's why Tulsi is gaining traction with the right. Funny how the mainstream media likes to frame her anti-war stance as extreme.. Tulsi 2020!

  24. And what about Iran having said many times that they want to wipe Israel off the face of the map, and the US as well, Tulsi?

  25. Goodjob Trump
    Sanction Iran till they be in there knees
    There regime are criminal public enemy number one
    This women is disgrace
    Saudi’s Arabia listen to America
    Saudi’s Arabia fight terrorism
    Saudi’s Arabia extinct religious people in there country
    They are alone and USA have to protect there allies

  26. If anyone we need to attack Saudi Arabia! AMERICAN troops never serve under foreiners. WWI WWII NATO . they're try… ain't gonna happen.I'm atrump support er and a recently retired veteran but I can't accept this.dems should wake up(well don't)and support this woman.shes the only Dem that seems sane. I guess she doesn't fit the crazy TRAITOROUS bizarro Dem nutbag communists Soros global puppet.

  27. Lives of American soldiers and money of American tax payers shouldn't be used for foreign country's interest. Her focus is the interest of American people, not foreign people. Thank you.

  28. Ms. Gabbard, if you appease the Iranians does that make us safer. I don't think so. England appeased Hilter and millions died.

  29. since when has fox news become a mouthpiece for progressive liberal democrat socialists? why is fox news trying to put progressive liberal democrat socialists in the white house. hyppocrisy.

  30. The democrats finally have one person who can defeat Trump. And the idiots will put either Biden or Pocahontas against him, just to give him 4 more years. Well, why I am complaining? After all, I'm an Israeli, So, If these idiots want so much to help us, who am I to undermine their efforts? Well, you see, all of us Israeli are also Army vets. And this means that we can relate to what Tulsi is saying. If she ran here in Israel for PM, she would have won. And I guess the same goes for the USA. But the problem is that the corrupt system, will never let her run. It will be Trump VS Biden or Trump VS Warren. In either case, Trump gets 4 more years. Maj. Gabbard will have to try again in 2024, this time she may run for the Reps, cause the Dem's are IDIOTS.

  31. Could Tulsi be removed from her command for bad mouthing Trump,her comander in Chief?

    Obama's Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years

    Defense: What the president calls "my military" is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.

    We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.

    Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.

    Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to "assist and provide intelligence for" military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.

    Other removals include the sacking of two nuclear commanders in a single week — Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the 20th Air Force, responsible for the three wings that maintain control of the 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the No. 2 officer at U.S. Strategic Command.

    From Breitbart.com's Facebook page comes a list of at least 197 officers that have been relieved of duty by President Obama for a laundry list of reasons and sometimes with no reason given. Stated grounds range from "leaving blast doors on nukes open" to "loss of confidence in command ability" to "mishandling of funds" to "inappropriate relationships" to "gambling with counterfeit chips" to "inappropriate behavior" to "low morale in troops commanded."

  32. Excellent answers from Tulsi. The journalist is very biased and not considering her statements. Is he paid by the Saudi embassy?

  33. This is incredible. She answers the same question consistently several times, and he is just desperately trying to get her to "compare countries" so he can get a sound bite which can be twisted to mean she is unpatriotic and supports U.S. "enemies" over U.S. allies. She continually corrects him and explains that his whole framing of the issue is completely irrelevant to the interests of the country; and he just keeps slamming his head into that same wall. It's pathetic. I would laugh at this display, but the problem is that what he is doing is defending the very same world view which is being shoved down people's throat by "The News" every day, normally without anyone there to push back against it; and that is why people are so utterly misinformed about the world.

  34. Trump claims to fight against Islamic Terrorism. Next thing he does is, ask Saudi Arabia' What terms should we go forward?'

  35. I think it is interesting that Gabbard assumed Trump is offering to be at Saudi's back and call. I would read Trump's tweet as "We need more info to procceed" which to me is responsible, logical course of action. Gabbard is "posturing and contrasting", because she is running for Trump's post 🤣

  36. Isn't it ironic that every time America wants a war with a country that country starts acting out and antagonizing America. This is just another attempt by the military industrial complex trying to force a war. People don't be fooled!

  37. Never forget Iran has proxies all over the middle East and being an Eurasian country is unasailable… i know americans love to play war but this is an elephant of another level.

  38. Just the loss of one American soldier is too much to fight for the Saudi government, let Saudi and Iran fight their own battles and leave the rest of the world out of it.

  39. Tulsi is very clear about defending the people of the United States but critical about the corporate wars we as people are forced to pay and fight in. She doesn’t succumb to the pitfalls this interviewer is setting up but plainly let’s what facts need to be known and the real issues we need to face as the American people move forward

  40. I love the Fox Viewers' comments here. "She is the sound of reason". Then they still vote for the corrupt idiot in the office. Orange man good, others bad.

  41. Do you recognize that baby looking interviewer as a wily media snake desperately trying to trap Tulsi?
    Rotten news media.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *