‘They respond to shame:’ Editor of satirical news site calls Gretna PD firings a ‘victory for the le

‘They respond to shame:’ Editor of satirical news site calls Gretna PD firings a ‘victory for the le


SUGGESTED SUGGESTED
ALEXANDRIA SUGGESTED
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SUGGESTED
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE SHOT ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE SHOT WHILE ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ SHOULD
BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN
INTERNET BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN
INTERNET STORY. BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN
INTERNET STORY. THAT BE SHOT WHILE COMMENTING ON AN
INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY
FALSELY INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY
FALSELY CLAIMED INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY
FALSELY CLAIMED THE INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY
FALSELY CLAIMED THE NEW INTERNET STORY. THAT STORY
FALSELY CLAIMED THE NEW YORK FALSELY CLAIMED THE NEW YORK FALSELY CLAIMED THE NEW YORK
CONGRESSWOMAN CONGRESSWOMAN CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD SAID CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD SAID “WE CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD SAID “WE PAY CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD SAID “WE PAY SOLDIERS CONGRESSWOMAN
HAD SAID “WE PAY SOLDIERS WAY HAD SAID “WE PAY SOLDIERS WAY HAD SAID “WE PAY SOLDIERS WAY
TOO HAD SAID “WE PAY SOLDIERS WAY
TOO MUCH.” TOO MUCH.” THE THE THING THE THING IS, THE THING IS, THE THE THING IS, THE POST THE THING IS, THE POST WAS THE THING IS, THE POST WAS
COMPLETELY THE THING IS, THE POST WAS
COMPLETELY MADE THE THING IS, THE POST WAS
COMPLETELY MADE UP… THE THING IS, THE POST WAS
COMPLETELY MADE UP… AND COMPLETELY MADE UP… AND COMPLETELY MADE UP… AND
CLEARLY COMPLETELY MADE UP… AND
CLEARLY MARKED COMPLETELY MADE UP… AND
CLEARLY MARKED AS CLEARLY MARKED AS CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” IT CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” IT WAS CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY CLEARLY MARKED AS
“SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE
WEBSITE “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE
WEBSITE “TATERS “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE
WEBSITE “TATERS GONNA “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE
WEBSITE “TATERS GONNA TATE” “SATIRE.” IT WAS POSTED BY THE
WEBSITE “TATERS GONNA TATE” ON WEBSITE “TATERS GONNA TATE” ON WEBSITE “TATERS GONNA TATE” ON
JULY JULY CHRISTOPHER CHRISTOPHER BLAIR CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE WEBSITE CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE WEBSITE AND CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE WEBSITE AND OTHERS CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE WEBSITE AND OTHERS LIKE CHRISTOPHER BLAIR SAYS HE RUNS
THE WEBSITE AND OTHERS LIKE IT. THE WEBSITE AND OTHERS LIKE IT. HE HE CALLS HE CALLS
HIMSELF HE CALLS
HIMSELF A HE CALLS
HIMSELF A LEFT-WING HE CALLS
HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL HE CALLS
HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO
MAKES HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO
MAKES UP HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO
MAKES UP FAKE HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO
MAKES UP FAKE STORIES HIMSELF A LEFT-WING TROLL WHO
MAKES UP FAKE STORIES ABOUT MAKES UP FAKE STORIES ABOUT MAKES UP FAKE STORIES ABOUT
LIBERAL MAKES UP FAKE STORIES ABOUT
LIBERAL POLITICIANS LIBERAL POLITICIANS LIBERAL POLITICIANS
LIKE LIBERAL POLITICIANS
LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, LIBERAL POLITICIANS
LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND LIBERAL POLITICIANS
LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES
THE LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES
THE RIGHT-WING LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES
THE RIGHT-WING WILL LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES
THE RIGHT-WING WILL TAKE LIKE OCASIO-CORTEZ, AND HOPES
THE RIGHT-WING WILL TAKE THE THE RIGHT-WING WILL TAKE THE THE RIGHT-WING WILL TAKE THE
BAIT. BAIT. BAIT.
AND BAIT.
AND HE BAIT.
AND HE SAID BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT WAS BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT WAS A BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT WAS A — BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE BAIT.
AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE — AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE — AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE —
“VICTORY AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE —
“VICTORY FOR AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE —
“VICTORY FOR THE AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE —
“VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” AND HE SAID IT WAS A — QUOTE —
“VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT “VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT “VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT
RISPOLI… “VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT
RISPOLI… AND “VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT
RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER “VICTORY FOR THE LEFT” THAT
RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER
WHO RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER
WHO “LIKED” RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER
WHO “LIKED” RISPOLI’S RISPOLI… AND ANOTHER OFFICER
WHO “LIKED” RISPOLI’S COMMENT… WHO “LIKED” RISPOLI’S COMMENT… WHO “LIKED” RISPOLI’S COMMENT…
WERE WERE WERE
FIRED. FIRED. FIRED.
12:14-12:19: FIRED.
12:14-12:19: NOT FIRED.
12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY FIRED.
12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO FIRED.
12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I
CONSIDER 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I
CONSIDER IT 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I
CONSIDER IT A 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I
CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, 12:14-12:19: NOT ONLY DO I
CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE
WHO CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE
WHO WORKS CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE
WHO WORKS WITH CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE
WHO WORKS WITH THE CONSIDER IT A VICTORY, EVERYONE
WHO WORKS WITH THE PAGE WHO WORKS WITH THE PAGE WHO WORKS WITH THE PAGE
CONSIDERS WHO WORKS WITH THE PAGE
CONSIDERS IT WHO WORKS WITH THE PAGE
CONSIDERS IT A CONSIDERS IT A CONSIDERS IT A
VICTORY. VICTORY. VICTORY.
1:16-1:21: VICTORY.
1:16-1:21: IT’S VICTORY.
1:16-1:21: IT’S A VICTORY.
1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL VICTORY.
1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, SO 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, SO THE 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT 1:16-1:21: IT’S A LIBERAL TROLL
OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG FOLKS OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG FOLKS AND OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG FOLKS AND MAKE OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG FOLKS AND MAKE THEM OPERATION, SO THE WHOLE POINT IS
TO SNAG FOLKS AND MAKE THEM LOOK TO SNAG FOLKS AND MAKE THEM LOOK TO SNAG FOLKS AND MAKE THEM LOOK
SILLY. SILLY. SILLY.
WE SILLY.
WE ASKED SILLY.
WE ASKED GRETNA SILLY.
WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE SILLY.
WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF
ARTHUR WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF
ARTHUR LAWSON WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF
ARTHUR LAWSON IF WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF
ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WE ASKED GRETNA POLICE CHIEF
ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WAS ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WAS ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WAS
CONCERNED ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WAS
CONCERNED THAT ARTHUR LAWSON IF HE WAS
CONCERNED THAT THE CONCERNED THAT THE CONCERNED THAT THE
POST CONCERNED THAT THE
POST WAS CONCERNED THAT THE
POST WAS INTENDED CONCERNED THAT THE
POST WAS INTENDED TO CONCERNED THAT THE
POST WAS INTENDED TO GET CONCERNED THAT THE
POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE
ON POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE
ON THE POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE
ON THE RIGHT POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE
ON THE RIGHT IN POST WAS INTENDED TO GET PEOPLE
ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE. ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE. ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE.
11:55-12:00: ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE.
11:55-12:00: I ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE.
11:55-12:00: I DON’T ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE.
11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW ON THE RIGHT IN TROUBLE.
11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR INTENT 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR INTENT WAS, 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF 11:55-12:00: I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT
WAS THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT
WAS THEIR THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT
WAS THEIR INTENT, THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT
WAS THEIR INTENT, IT THEIR INTENT WAS, DAVID. IF THAT
WAS THEIR INTENT, IT WORKED. WAS THEIR INTENT, IT WORKED. THE THE FACT-CHECKING THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE
POLITIFACT THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE
POLITIFACT UMASKED THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE
POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE
POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN THE FACT-CHECKING WEBSITE
POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017 POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017 POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017
AS POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017
AS ONE POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017
AS ONE OF POLITIFACT UMASKED BLAIR IN 2017
AS ONE OF THE AS ONE OF THE AS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST AS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST PRODUCERS AS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST PRODUCERS OF AS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST PRODUCERS OF FAKE AS ONE OF THE
BIGGEST PRODUCERS OF FAKE NEWS BIGGEST PRODUCERS OF FAKE NEWS BIGGEST PRODUCERS OF FAKE NEWS
ONLINE. ONLINE. ONLINE.
BUT ONLINE.
BUT BLAIR, ONLINE.
BUT BLAIR, WHO ONLINE.
BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES ONLINE.
BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN ONLINE.
BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE, BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE, BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD ME BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD ME THE BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD ME THE STORIES BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD ME THE STORIES HE BUT BLAIR, WHO LIVES IN MAINE,
TOLD ME THE STORIES HE WRITES TOLD ME THE STORIES HE WRITES TOLD ME THE STORIES HE WRITES
ARE TOLD ME THE STORIES HE WRITES
ARE SO ARE SO ARE SO
RIDICULOUS, ARE SO
RIDICULOUS, AND ARE SO
RIDICULOUS, AND SO ARE SO
RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY
MARKED RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY
MARKED “SATIRE,” RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY
MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY
MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S RIDICULOUS, AND SO CLEARLY
MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S NOT MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S NOT MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S NOT
HIS MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S NOT
HIS FAULT MARKED “SATIRE,” THAT IT’S NOT
HIS FAULT IF HIS FAULT IF HIS FAULT IF
PEOPLE HIS FAULT IF
PEOPLE ACTUALLY HIS FAULT IF
PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE HIS FAULT IF
PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THEM. PEOPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVE THEM. SOME SOME PARENTS SOME PARENTS ON SOME PARENTS ON THE SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE
ARE SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE
ARE SPEAKING SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE
ARE SPEAKING OUT SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE
ARE SPEAKING OUT AFTER SOME PARENTS ON THE NORTH SHORE
ARE SPEAKING OUT AFTER THEIR ARE SPEAKING OUT AFTER THEIR

3 Replies to “‘They respond to shame:’ Editor of satirical news site calls Gretna PD firings a ‘victory for the le

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *